Sam Hartman (hartmans) wrote,
Sam Hartman
hartmans

The IESG—particularly Brian—has got to get over being so confrontational. Dean Anderson filed an appeal with the IESG because he believes his comments on an Anycast BCP have not been addressed. The document is just now entering IETF last call. What does Brian do? He sends Dean a message saying that he doesn't understand what IESG decision Dean is appealing and that unless he explains exactly what he is appealing, then the Brian will not allow the IESG to consider Dean's appeal. It really would have been simpler to either let Dean know that we were interpreting his message as last call comments not as an appeal, or to suggest that it would be simpler for him to send last call comments. Yeah, Dean is a pain to deal with. However writing a message designed to defuse the situation just doesn't take much more effort than the message Brian sent. This sort of problem is endemic of the last year of IESG behavior.
Tags: ietf
Subscribe

  • Making our Community Safe: the FSF and rms

    I felt disgust and horror when I learned yesterday that rms had returned to the FSF board. When rms resigned back in September of 2019, I was Debian…

  • Good Job Debian: Compatibility back to 1999

    So, I needed a container of Debian Slink (2.1), released back in 1999. I expected this was going to be a long and involved process. Things didn't…

  • Forged Email

    Last night, a series of forged emails was sent to a number of places around the Debian, Ubuntu and Free Software communities. The meat of the mail…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments