Sam Hartman (hartmans) wrote,
Sam Hartman

Goal setting

A while ago I discussed the new goal setting process at work. In the interest of reducing paperwork the new process comes with software instead of paper forms. The hope is that we'll be able to use the software instead of the previous process of a bunch of paper for everything. My group of managers recently reviewed the software. It was very simple. . . very very simple.

The employee fills out their goals. The manager can edit their goals. Then the employee and manager meet. Then each party signs off on the goals.

"If I'm sending goals back to an employee to do some additional work on them, where do I enter the comments? Is that just in email?" Silence. "You want to send it back to the employee rather than just editing it yourself?" "Yes. Possibly iterating multiple times." "I don't think it supports iterative processes."

In fact, while this can be fixed in various ways, the current process has no way to edit the goals once the manager has saved. Yes, that's right: if during the meeting with the employee, you discover you want to change something, that's too bad. Or if you hit save accidentally.

How do people make these mistakes?


  • Making our Community Safe: the FSF and rms

    I felt disgust and horror when I learned yesterday that rms had returned to the FSF board. When rms resigned back in September of 2019, I was Debian…

  • Good Job Debian: Compatibility back to 1999

    So, I needed a container of Debian Slink (2.1), released back in 1999. I expected this was going to be a long and involved process. Things didn't…

  • Forged Email

    Last night, a series of forged emails was sent to a number of places around the Debian, Ubuntu and Free Software communities. The meat of the mail…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.